By Paul Scicchitano
With the world’s economic problems forcing some tough business decisions, three of the hardest hit sectors remain committed to the value of industry-specific quality certification programs for suppliers.
“It’s an initiative that has to be looked at periodically along with all the other initiatives to manage the supply base, to make sure there’s congruency and to make sure there’s an integration of the initiatives that result in overall improvement of the suppliers,” observes Joe Bransky, who represents General Motors on the International Automotive Task Force (IATF), which developed the ISO/TS 16949 requirement for automotive supplier quality.
“That foundation of certainty that TS 16949 provides is probably more essential than ever,” Bransky insists.
Automotive
The automotive industry is set to release a new edition of the international technical specification for supplier quality during the first quarter of 2009 through the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), which recently published the fourth edition of ISO 9001. The automotive release incorporates all of the generic quality requirements along with industry specific ones.
Bransky says there won’t be any new requirements for some 38,000 certified supplier organizations around the world in the next edition of TS 16949 beyond those prescribed by the recent changes to ISO 9001.
Application of the clarifications related to ISO 9001:2008 requirements in the boxed text of ISO/TS 16949:2009 will be effective not later than 120 days after the release of ISO/TS 16949:2009, according to Bransky.
Changes to the generic quality requirement were intentionally limited to clarifying existing requirements or improving compatibility with ISO’s environmental management system standard — ISO 14001.
Aviation, Space and Defense
That is not the case in the aerospace industry, which plans to launch a revised edition of AS9100 in January with several new improvements.
The new edition is intended to reflect the changes to ISO 9001, while at the same time introducing new requirements for aviation, space and defense companies. Like the automotive document, AS9100 also contains the verbatim text of the international quality management system standard.
“One of our requirements of our design specification is that the standard had to be applicable to all 10,000 of our stakeholders and that the benefits exceed the costs,” explains Buddy Cressionnie of Lockheed Martin Aeronautics, who led the Americas participation in the drafting process for the soon-to-be released AS9100 revision C for aviation, space and defense companies.
“We believe that the requirements are written in such a way that any size company can implement these changes and the level of complexity will depend on the complexity of their business,” he says.
According to Cressionnie, the new edition of AS9100 will include a new title to better reflect the document’s applicability to defense and space organizations (Quality Management Systems — Aviation, Space and Defense — Requirements) and new or enhanced requirements devoted to project management. (Clause 7.1.1), risk management (Clause 7.1.2) and configuration management (Clause 7.1.3 moved from 4.3).
As a result of the more significant changes, subscribing companies are expected to be given a 30-month transition window to demonstrate conformance starting in March 2009.
“I think they’ll be able to see that the benefits outweigh the costs of implementing this standard,” Cressionnie says of users. “If you’re able to implement a more effective robust risk management and you’re able to avoid surprises downstream, I think that definitely has preventive action components where you are saving costs and avoiding rework at a later stage.”
Telecom
The telecommunications industry, which also incorporates the international quality standard in its TL 9000 document, is in the process of updating Version 4.0 of the TL 9000 Requirements Handbook to Version 5.0. The planned release will take place in fall of 2009 and will include e-training on the changes, according to Don Irvine, director, marketing and product development with QuEST Forum, which administers the telecom program.
“There are a variety of changes throughout the handbook; including more detail, more clarity, additional and revised Adders and notes,” says Irvine, noting that three areas in particular are being emphasized in the revision — risk management, supplier management and design for manufacturability.
“We do not expect the revisions to cause a significant financial burden or impact,” says Irvine, noting that 1,625 certificates had been issued to TL 9000 around the world. “There will be an acceptable transition period. We expect the revisions to have added value to the telecom community as most of the changes are a result of input from current users and they have made the improvements that give them added value. Also we will be staying current with ISO with the benefits to the organization from the new and updated TL 9000 requirements.”
Added Value
Bransky adds that the question automotive suppliers should be asking about quality certification is what value is being derived in terms of improved process control, risk mitigation, customer satisfaction and reduction in quality costs based on the certification investment.
“From that standpoint, I don’t think there’s any question about it. If the requirements are properly understood and implemented by the organization, it’s clearly an investment that is going to bring substantial return,” Bransky explains. “Those who implemented simply to get a certificate to hang on the wall and go back to doing business as usual, it’s not going to be particularly value added for them.”







By Paul Scicchitano
By Paul Scicchitano
By Paul Scicchitano
By Paul Scicchitano
The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has released the first substantial regulatory changes to design and production approvals for the US civil aviation industry since 1964.
By Clyde Brewer
By Joelle Jay